May 18, 2015

4 lessons the industry can learn from Ecopetrol

Latin America
Oil
Oil & Gas
Energy Digital Staff
3 min
Click here to read th...

Click here to read the May 2015 issue of Energy Digital

As reported by two of our sister sites, Business Review America Latina (en espanol) and Exploration World, very few industry insiders expected Empresa Colombiana de Petroleos, more commonly known as Ecopetrol, to reach a first quarter net income of USD $66.952 million.

But that’s exactly what they did, proudly announcing the accomplishment on the heels of a reported 42 percent drop in year-end profit for 2014 compared to 2013. Looking specifically at the fourth quarter comparisons reveals the most drastic point: USD $258.06 million in the red—down more than 126 percent.

That loss resulted in the largest drop Ecopetrol has encountered in six years yet was not entirely uncommon for the industry as a whole: oil and gas companies across the board have suffered due to plummeting prices.

Related: How could falling oil prices affect renewable energy growth?

Fortunately for this corporation, prudent planning and growth of the refining sector coupled with improved (but far from recovered) oil prices are helping to put it back on-track.

"Despite the decline in oil prices, in the first quarter of 2015, Ecopetrol reached a positive financial result due to the good performance of these different segments and favorable environmental conditions for the operation," CEO Juan Carlos Echeverry explained. 

This significant growth has industry experts asking: What is Ecopetrol focusing on to achieve profits during the most volatile period in the industry's recent history? 

Related: Citigroup report spells trouble for oil, further growth for renewables

1. Operating performance

The company was able to stretch its refining margin to $18.20 per barrel in the first quarter of 2015 compared to $16.30 per barrel during the same period in 2014, a 12 percent gain.

2. Production volume

According to Ecopetrol, production at the company grew by a modest 1 percent in the first quarter of 2015 however this translates to a total production volume of about 536,600 barrels of oil per day and 116,700 barrels of oil equivalent (in natural gas). The production rate of oil and natural gas together pushed growth up to 2 percent when compared to first quarter 2014.

Related: Risk management in oil and gas

3. Subsidiaries

Ecopetrol's affiliated companies also did their part to contribute to production growth in the group: The cumulative oil and natural gas production of Hocol, Savia, Equion and Ecopetrol America rose approximately 6 percent, or 51,400 barrels of oil equivalent per day. And when Ecopetrol took a hit from a public relations perspective as a result of a media attack by FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) last year, the company combated the drop in shares by investing in international subsidiaries such as Germany GmbH. 

Related: Strange bedfellows: New API report details the importance of cooperation between oil and renewables

4. Maintenance costs and contracted services

Efforts to reduce maintenance costs and contracted services have resulted in a 21 percent decrease, balancing the bottom line with the depreciation in oil.

 

Let's connect! Click here to like us on Facebook, and here to follow us on Twitter

Share article

Jul 29, 2021

Carbon dioxide removal revenues worth £2bn a year by 2030

Energy
technology
CCUS
Netzero
Dominic Ellis
4 min
Engineered greenhouse gas removals will become "a major new infrastructure sector" in the coming decades says the UK's National Infrastructure Commission

Carbon dioxide removal revenues could reach £2bn a year by 2030 in the UK with costs per megatonne totalling up to £400 million, according to the National Infrastructure Commission

Engineered greenhouse gas removals will become "a major new infrastructure sector" in the coming decades - although costs are uncertain given removal technologies are in their infancy - and revenues could match that of the UK’s water sector by 2050. The Commission’s analysis suggests engineered removals technologies need to have capacity to remove five to ten megatonnes of carbon dioxide no later than 2030, and between 40 and 100 megatonnes by 2050.

The Commission states technologies fit into two categories: extracting carbon dioxide directly out of the air; and bioenergy with carbon capture technology – processing biomass to recapture carbon dioxide absorbed as the fuel grew. In both cases, the captured CO2 is then stored permanently out of the atmosphere, typically under the seabed.

The report sets out how the engineered removal and storage of carbon dioxide offers the most realistic way to mitigate the final slice of emissions expected to remain by the 2040s from sources that don’t currently have a decarbonisation solution, like aviation and agriculture. 

It stresses that the potential of these technologies is “not an excuse to delay necessary action elsewhere” and cannot replace efforts to reduce emissions from sectors like road transport or power, where removals would be a more expensive alternative.  

The critical role these technologies will play in meeting climate targets means government must rapidly kick start the sector so that it becomes viable by the 2030s, according to the report, which was commissioned by government in November 2020. 

Early movement by the UK to develop the expertise and capacity in greenhouse gas removal technologies could create a comparative advantage, with the prospect of other countries needing to procure the knowledge and skills the UK develops.

The Commission recommends that government should support the development of this new sector in the short term with policies that drive delivery of these technologies and create demand through obligations on polluting industries, which will over time enable a competitive market to develop. Robust independent regulation must also be put in place from the start to help build public and investor confidence.

While the burden of these costs could be shared by different parts of industries required to pay for removals or in part shared with government, the report acknowledges that, over the longer term, the aim should be to have polluting sectors pay for removals they need to reach carbon targets.

Polluting industries are likely to pass a proportion of the costs onto consumers. While those with bigger household expenditures will pay more than those on lower incomes, the report underlines that government will need to identify ways of protecting vulnerable consumers and to decide where in relevant industry supply chains the costs should fall.

Chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, Sir John Armitt, said taking steps to clean our air is something we’re going to have to get used to, just as we already manage our wastewater and household refuse. 

"While engineered removals will not be everyone’s favourite device in the toolkit, they are there for the hardest jobs. And in the overall project of mitigating our impact on the planet for the sake of generations to come, we need every tool we can find," he said.

“But to get close to having the sector operating where and when we need it to, the government needs to get ahead of the game now. The adaptive approach to market building we recommend will create the best environment for emerging technologies to develop quickly and show their worth, avoiding the need for government to pick winners. We know from the dramatic fall in the cost of renewables that this approach works and we must apply the lessons learned to this novel, but necessary, technology.” 

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and International Energy Agency estimate a global capacity for engineered removals of 2,000 to 16,000 megatonnes of carbon dioxide each year by 2050 will be needed in order to meet global reduction targets. 

Yesterday Summit Carbon Solutions received "a strategic investment" from John Deere to advance a major CCUS project (click here). The project will accelerate decarbonisation efforts across the agriculture industry by enabling the production of low carbon ethanol, resulting in the production of more sustainable food, feed, and fuel. Summit Carbon Solutions has partnered with 31 biorefineries across the Midwest United States to capture and permanently sequester their CO2 emissions.  

Cory Reed, President, Agriculture & Turf Division of John Deere, said: "Carbon neutral ethanol would have a positive impact on the environment and bolster the long-term sustainability of the agriculture industry. The work Summit Carbon Solutions is doing will be critical in delivering on these goals."

McKinsey highlights a number of CCUS methods which can drive CO2 to net zero:

  • Today’s leader: Enhanced oil recovery Among CO2 uses by industry, enhanced oil recovery leads the field. It accounts for around 90 percent of all CO2 usage today
  • Cementing in CO2 for the ages New processes could lock up CO2 permanently in concrete, “storing” CO2 in buildings, sidewalks, or anywhere else concrete is used
  • Carbon neutral fuel for jets Technically, CO2 could be used to create virtually any type of fuel. Through a chemical reaction, CO2 captured from industry can be combined with hydrogen to create synthetic gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel
  • Capturing CO2 from ambient air - anywhere Direct air capture (DAC) could push CO2 emissions into negative territory in a big way
  • The biomass-energy cycle: CO2 neutral or even negative Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage relies on nature to remove CO2 from the atmosphere for use elsewhere

Share article