Feb 6, 2014

Key insights on energy issues and climate change

Admin
4 min
Follow @EnergyDigital M...

Make sure to check out the latest issue of Energy Digital magazine

Jules Kortenhorst is the chief executive officer at the Rocky Mountain Institute and is a recognized leader on global energy issues and climate change. His background spans business, government, entrepreneurial, and nonprofit leadership. GLOBE spoke with Jules about his work at RMI and inline with his participation at the upcoming GLOBE 2014 Conference, taking place in Vancouver, Canada, from March 26-28. 

GLOBE: You have a long history with the energy industry, having worked for energy giant Royal Dutch Shell and as the CEO of a Netherlands-based bioenergy company (Topell Energy BV). How do you feel your previous work in the energy industry has prepared you for your current role as CEO of the Rocky Mountain Institute?

JK: There is no doubt that the energy industry has many unique aspects. Having worked in the industry before helps me understand the challenges as well as the opportunities that result from the energy revolution for which we now advocate. Large companies like Shell will find it hard to adjust, but if they do, they have a tremendous contribution to make into the future.

GLOBE: The energy sector worldwide is undergoing a profound transformation. New technologies have opened up vast reserves of untapped resources that, in turn, have upset long-established relationships in the energy marketplace. What advice do you have for policy makers and investors when it comes to making the right decisions given that there is so much uncertainty about the future global energy mix?

JK: There are a few interesting trends which both policy makers and investors should consider:

First, there is the cost trend line. On the one hand there is shale gas, currently very cheap in the U.S., but what is the medium term outlook for gas costs? Is the trend up or down? How come Shell has just concluded that it can not make money in this business in the U.S.? And at the same time, the cost of reducing energy demand (i.e. efficiency) or renewables (in particular solar and wind) is going down rapidly. Those learning curves will determine future returns.

Second there is the challenge of climate change. IPCC has told us we can only emit a further 560 Gt of CO2. What is the stranded asset risk associated with large fossil fuel companies beyond the immediate horizon?

Finally, there is the question of the consumer. An electric car, maybe even on a shared basis, is rapidly becoming cool and sexy. LED lamps are now in reach, and so much easier, with higher functionality. The Nest is now part of Google: I think the old energy sector will soon find itself in the same position as the mainframe companies in the late ’80s, early ’90s.

GLOBE: You are also the founding CEO of the European Climate Foundation (ECF), a major philanthropic initiative to promote climate and energy policies that greatly reduce Europe’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and mitigate climate change. Do you think the business model for this initiative could be applied in other jurisdictions and/or on other continents with equal success?

JK: It has been. In fact, ECF was modeled on the Energy Foundation here in the U.S., and my dear friends at EF were instrumental in helping ECF’s success.

GLOBE: The Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) is applying its “Reinventing Fire” initiative to focus on four core energy sectors – transportation, buildings, industry, and electricity – with the hopes of transforming global energy to become “cleaner” and more efficient. Which of RMI’s current initiatives do you feel have the greatest overall potential for reducing global GHG emissions?

JK: There are two parts to that answer. First, we have to look at the integrated picture and work on all the aspects of the energy portfolio at the same time. So, although in the short run maybe our electricity work abates most CO2, it can only be successful if we deliver more efficient buildings, if the electric car becomes integrated into the grid, etc.

But unrelated, we are doing the same work in China now. Reinventing Fire China, which we carry out together with the Lawrence Berkeley lab, the Energy Foundation China and ERI, the energy research institute of the planning commission of the Chinese government, will hopefully inform China’s next 5 Year Plan and thereby have a huge impact.

GLOBE: You will be joining other energy industry executives from around the world at GLOBE 2014 this March 26-28 in Vancouver, Canada, as a speaker in a session on The Global Energy Mix: Opportunities & RealitiesWhat message do you hope to bring to the international delegates and audience that will be attending GLOBE 2014?

JK: The changes in the global energy industry are now rapidly accelerating. A magnificent, but challenging opportunity, for creating wealth while addressing climate change and sustainability is emerging. These are exciting times.

Photo credit: Dan Breckwoldt / Shutterstock.com

Share article

May 13, 2021

All but two UK regions failing on school energy efficiency

schools
energyefficiency
Renewables
Dominic Ellis
2 min
Yorkshire & the Humber and the North East are the only UK regions where schools have collectively reduced how much they spend on energy per pupil

Most schools are still "treading water" on implementing energy efficient technology, according to new analysis of Government data from eLight.

Yorkshire & the Humber and the North East are the only regions where schools have collectively reduced how much they spend on energy per pupil, cutting expenditure by 4.4% and 0.9% respectively. Every other region of England increased its average energy expenditure per pupil, with schools in Inner London doing so by as much as 23.5%.

According to The Carbon Trust, energy bills in UK schools amount to £543 million per year, with 50% of a school’s total electricity cost being lighting. If every school in the UK implemented any type of energy efficient technology, over £100 million could be saved each year.

Harvey Sinclair, CEO of eEnergy, eLight’s parent company, said the figures demonstrate an uncomfortable truth for the education sector – namely that most schools are still treading water on the implementation of energy efficient technology. Energy efficiency could make a huge difference to meeting net zero ambitions, but most schools are still lagging behind.

“The solutions exist, but they are not being deployed fast enough," he said. "For example, we’ve made great progress in upgrading schools to energy-efficient LED lighting, but with 80% of schools yet to make the switch, there’s an enormous opportunity to make a collective reduction in carbon footprint and save a lot of money on energy bills. Our model means the entire project is financed, doesn’t require any upfront expenditure, and repayments are more than covered by the energy savings made."

He said while it has worked with over 300 schools, most are still far too slow to commit. "We are urging them to act with greater urgency because climate change won’t wait, and the need for action gets more pressing every year. The education sector has an important part to play in that and pupils around the country expect their schools to do so – there is still a huge job to be done."

North Yorkshire County Council is benefiting from the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme, which has so far awarded nearly £1bn for energy efficiency and heat decarbonisation projects around the country, and Craven schools has reportedly made a successful £2m bid (click here).

The Department for Education has issued 13 tips for reducing energy and water use in schools.

Share article