Yingli Solar Makes a Strong Statement at 2014 World Cup
This year’s world cup has been dramatic, emotional, and extremely enjoyable to watch because of the extremely high quality of play on the field. News surrounding the World Cup has also been quite dramatic for a different reason, as Brazilians take to the streets to protest a variety of things, including the Cup itself.
However, one of the most interesting stories to come from the Cup this year has been its reliance on green energy. Seven of the stadiums hosting the World Cup are partially powered by solar energy. The stadium in the capitol city of Brasilia is seeking out a LEED Platinum rating, the highest available recognition for a sustainable building. Rio de Janiero’s stadium is also on its way to the coveted certification.
One of the biggest proponents of this sustainable World Cup is the China-based Yingli Solar. The company is making its presence known in more ways than just having pitchside advertisements. Yingli Solar is looking to expand into more international markets and it’s letting the world know it in Brazil.
Yingli is already heavily invested in football, as it is a sponsor of the U.S. team, as well as Germany’s FC Bayern München.
By sponsoring the World Cup, however, Yingli is setting a precedent. The company is the Cup’s first carbon-neutral sponsor, meaning that all of its operations in Brazil will leave no carbon footprint. Yingli is achieving this by supplying more than 5,000 solar panels and almost 30 off-grid solar energy systems that will help power the stadiums used for the games.
Yingli’s carbon neutrality is being independently verified by ClimatePartner, a certified environmental agency.
"By becoming history's first carbon neutral sponsor of the FIFA World Cup, Yingli is honoring its commitment to our environment and to our planet," Chairman and CEO Liansheng Miao said in a press release.
This is not Yingli’s first time making the news, either. At the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, it became not only the first Chinese sponsor of the Cup, but also the first in the renewable energy sector. Yingli left behind a legacy in Africa via its providing of solar power to 20 “Football for Hope” centers across Africa. Through its “Football for Hope, Energy for Hope” program, Yingli wanted to aid in the improvement of social conditions across the continent.
Last week, Yingli announced plans to leave another World Cup legacy, this time in Brazil. The company plans on leaving behind a large solar project, which could generate between 400 to 600 kW of energy.
"Our goal is to leave behind a positive legacy in Brazil even after the 2014 FIFA World Cup is over. We are proud of the solar projects we have provided, but we also wanted to do more to directly support local Brazilian communities who are making positive impact on the environment,” Judy Tzeng Lee, Yingli’s VP of Global Marketing said.
Yingli’s attempt to increase their standing on the world stage appears to be working this year’s World Cup efforts notwithstanding. Yingli Solar took home the number one spot in market research firm IHS’ survey of the strongest solar PV module brands. There were 75 brands included in the study.
Yingli Solar is definitely a company to take note of as it works to position itself as a global leader in solar energy. So, for this year’s World Cup, football isn’t the only thing to watch.
Carbon dioxide removal revenues worth £2bn a year by 2030
Carbon dioxide removal revenues could reach £2bn a year by 2030 in the UK with costs per megatonne totalling up to £400 million, according to the National Infrastructure Commission.
Engineered greenhouse gas removals will become "a major new infrastructure sector" in the coming decades - although costs are uncertain given removal technologies are in their infancy - and revenues could match that of the UK’s water sector by 2050. The Commission’s analysis suggests engineered removals technologies need to have capacity to remove five to ten megatonnes of carbon dioxide no later than 2030, and between 40 and 100 megatonnes by 2050.
The Commission states technologies fit into two categories: extracting carbon dioxide directly out of the air; and bioenergy with carbon capture technology – processing biomass to recapture carbon dioxide absorbed as the fuel grew. In both cases, the captured CO2 is then stored permanently out of the atmosphere, typically under the seabed.
The report sets out how the engineered removal and storage of carbon dioxide offers the most realistic way to mitigate the final slice of emissions expected to remain by the 2040s from sources that don’t currently have a decarbonisation solution, like aviation and agriculture.
It stresses that the potential of these technologies is “not an excuse to delay necessary action elsewhere” and cannot replace efforts to reduce emissions from sectors like road transport or power, where removals would be a more expensive alternative.
The critical role these technologies will play in meeting climate targets means government must rapidly kick start the sector so that it becomes viable by the 2030s, according to the report, which was commissioned by government in November 2020.
Early movement by the UK to develop the expertise and capacity in greenhouse gas removal technologies could create a comparative advantage, with the prospect of other countries needing to procure the knowledge and skills the UK develops.
The Commission recommends that government should support the development of this new sector in the short term with policies that drive delivery of these technologies and create demand through obligations on polluting industries, which will over time enable a competitive market to develop. Robust independent regulation must also be put in place from the start to help build public and investor confidence.
While the burden of these costs could be shared by different parts of industries required to pay for removals or in part shared with government, the report acknowledges that, over the longer term, the aim should be to have polluting sectors pay for removals they need to reach carbon targets.
Polluting industries are likely to pass a proportion of the costs onto consumers. While those with bigger household expenditures will pay more than those on lower incomes, the report underlines that government will need to identify ways of protecting vulnerable consumers and to decide where in relevant industry supply chains the costs should fall.
Chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, Sir John Armitt, said taking steps to clean our air is something we’re going to have to get used to, just as we already manage our wastewater and household refuse.
"While engineered removals will not be everyone’s favourite device in the toolkit, they are there for the hardest jobs. And in the overall project of mitigating our impact on the planet for the sake of generations to come, we need every tool we can find," he said.
“But to get close to having the sector operating where and when we need it to, the government needs to get ahead of the game now. The adaptive approach to market building we recommend will create the best environment for emerging technologies to develop quickly and show their worth, avoiding the need for government to pick winners. We know from the dramatic fall in the cost of renewables that this approach works and we must apply the lessons learned to this novel, but necessary, technology.”
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and International Energy Agency estimate a global capacity for engineered removals of 2,000 to 16,000 megatonnes of carbon dioxide each year by 2050 will be needed in order to meet global reduction targets.
Yesterday Summit Carbon Solutions received "a strategic investment" from John Deere to advance a major CCUS project (click here). The project will accelerate decarbonisation efforts across the agriculture industry by enabling the production of low carbon ethanol, resulting in the production of more sustainable food, feed, and fuel. Summit Carbon Solutions has partnered with 31 biorefineries across the Midwest United States to capture and permanently sequester their CO2 emissions.
Cory Reed, President, Agriculture & Turf Division of John Deere, said: "Carbon neutral ethanol would have a positive impact on the environment and bolster the long-term sustainability of the agriculture industry. The work Summit Carbon Solutions is doing will be critical in delivering on these goals."
McKinsey highlights a number of CCUS methods which can drive CO2 to net zero:
- Today’s leader: Enhanced oil recovery Among CO2 uses by industry, enhanced oil recovery leads the field. It accounts for around 90 percent of all CO2 usage today
- Cementing in CO2 for the ages New processes could lock up CO2 permanently in concrete, “storing” CO2 in buildings, sidewalks, or anywhere else concrete is used
- Carbon neutral fuel for jets Technically, CO2 could be used to create virtually any type of fuel. Through a chemical reaction, CO2 captured from industry can be combined with hydrogen to create synthetic gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel
- Capturing CO2 from ambient air - anywhere Direct air capture (DAC) could push CO2 emissions into negative territory in a big way
- The biomass-energy cycle: CO2 neutral or even negative Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage relies on nature to remove CO2 from the atmosphere for use elsewhere