May 17, 2020


energy security
India energy
oil & gas
13 min
Preparing for India's growing energy needs
A Report Compiled By : RA Mineral & Energy Resources Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Executive Summary This paper highlights the importance of Indias energ...


A Report Compiled By :

RA Mineral & Energy Resources Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.


Executive Summary

This paper highlights the importance of India’s energy security and the possible repercussions of Government’s policy paralysis, which is hurting the endeavors of energy firms.

India’s energy security is not attributed and confined to just the Oil & Gas industry, whose role cannot be denied in India’s overall growth story. The Government has indeed taken steps in the right direction but now it has become critical for India to introduce policy reforms to secure India’s growing energy needs. Starting from making the present Production Sharing Contract (PSC) structure more remunerative for the investors, to rationalizing the taxation regime for the sector, changes are indispensable. The biggest hurdle currently is the sector’s slow decision-making process. The dwindling interest of foreign investors and their exodus are big concerns, especially at a time when India needs them and the technology they possess. Not to forget, the reforms that India needs in the downstream and midstream sectors and the coordination among various Ministries.


The Indian economy is at a crucial juncture. 2012 marks the beginning of the 12th five year plan and the economic scenario does not look very encouraging. Not just the European crisis but the fluctuating Crude price (on which India’s dependence is precariously high at ~ 80% currently) is also increasing the uncertainties. And though in recent times, Crude prices are showing signs of relief, the depreciation of Indian Rupee vis-à-vis US Dollar is not helping. But again, this also underlines the issue of India’s growing dependency on energy. Analysts believe that the situation will not change much, be it high Crude prices or lower valuation of Indian currency, neither of the problems augurs well for the Indian economy. So then, what are the possible options we have? How do we navigate through the crisis?

Option 1: Reduce imports and solve both the problems. With the population, substantially over one billion, and growing energy demand this is not a policy solution.

Option 2: Maximize self-sufficiency. This perhaps is one of the more sustainable options. Though India has the fourth biggest reserves of Coal and is the second biggest Coal producer, the Petroleum sector still continues to play a pre-eminent role in meeting the energy requirements of the country. In fact, 45% of the total energy needs are met by Oil & Gas. Though India’s present levels of per capita energy consumption is extremely low, with the economy expected to grow between 7% and 9%, energy consumption is set to increase. Though, other sources of energy, especially Coal will remain important, the Petroleum sector is crucial in determining India’s energy security.

During the second half of the last decade, India’s energy consumption has gone up from 382 Million Tonnes of oil equivalent (MTOE) to 525 MTOE. And when we talk about maximizing self-sufficiency, it includes increasing the exploration activity in the country; bringing in more technology and liaisoning with mature countries in the Oil & Gas sector, like Norway. Invite more foreign investments and make the environment more investor friendly. Needless to mention for all these, India needs – bureaucracy, polity and the tax regime working in tandem to achieve nation’s energy security.

Read more in July's issue of Energy Digital: The Future of Transportation

Hurdles In India’s Energy Security

• Bureaucratic and political hurdles: Domestic production stagnated

• Lower indigenous production and exploration: Fizzling NELP

• Energy security vs. national security: Defence hurdles

• International force: Fear of supply disruption

• Gas imports and international negotiation

• Overseas merger & acquisitions: Chinese aggression

• Non-remunerative taxation regime

• New technology for new source of energy: CBM, Shale Gas, Oil Sand, etc.

• Interrelated policy framework for upstream, midstream and downstream

Achieving Energy Security

India’s energy demand is growing by about 7% and based on the growth rate, International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that India may need to invest $800 Billion by 2030 for meeting its demand. What makes this imperative is the fact that India’s annual production is 2.3% of the world’s total energy production, but India’s consumption is 3.3% of the world’s total overall energy supply. The deficit is estimated to surpass Japan and Russia by 2030 placing India in the third position in terms of annual energy consumption.

1. Growing Imports with Growing Economy: Domestic Production Stagnates

Fact: India’s domestic production has stagnated to around 33-35 MMT and imports have gone up from 120 MMT to 142 MMT between 2007-2011. Clearly, domestic production remained flat, probably because of the slow pace of decision-making, bureaucratic hurdles, limited prospectivity, delays in commissioning of new projects and declining production from existing fields.


• Delay in approvals to the already discovered fields. Best example is Cairn-ONGC JV in Rajasthan. Indirectly, the bureaucracy and politics held back the decision on allowing ramp up from Barmer oil block, by almost a year. Timely approval for ramp up in Rajasthan would have reduced oil imports and saved forex reserves

• Though the issue has now been resolved but crucial time and money is already lost

• Still many of the oil blocks await approvals from DGH/Petroleum Ministry/Other Ministries

• Exploration in many of the pre-NELP and NELP blocks stopped because of hurdles


• PMO principal secretary has formed a group to resolve inter-ministerial issues

• The inter-ministerial group is focused on petroleum sector. Steps in such direction would surely help

• PMO should make sure that the Petroleum Ministry will expedite the clearance process

2. Lower Indigenous Production and Exploration: Fizzling NELP


• No significant increase in exploration expenditure in NELP blocks (See Table 5)

• No significant increase in investments seen, despite few big discoveries in some of the NELP blocks

• Under NELP-IX committed investment in the awarded blocks is about $582.29 Million

• So naturally, there is a significant dip between NELP-VIII and NELP-IX


• NELP was meant to attract global energy giants but India’s low prospectivity is a deterrent (See Table 1)

• Experience of global giants in Indian E&P sector: some examples

o Bureaucratic hurdles in BP’s $7.2 Billion investment to pick up stake in RIL’s assets

o Vedanta faced 16 months delay for acquiring majority stake in Cairn India

o Delays in approvals finally forced ENI to minimize its operation

o BHP Billiton NELP blocks have issues with Defence Ministry clearances

• Investors don’t get a smooth exit route: Cairn Energy’s exit was made very difficult

• Production sharing contract is regressive and confusing in nature: no clarity, freedom on gas pricing

• Long process for allowing investors and technology experts, if they want to invest: again many examples but BP’s entry was not smooth

• Arbitrary rules for clearances: It is expected that blocks offered under NELP have all the required clearances in place. However, in the middle of exploration phase, various wings of Government create hurdles; especially Defence Ministry. Best example is BHP Billiton, who is likely to lose its entire portfolio if policy action is further delayed


• PMO* principal secretary has formed a group to resolve inter-ministerial issues

• Petroleum Ministry/DGH# should make sure that before the block is offered for NELP** rounds, all the negotiations and clearances are in place

• Move towards the open acreage system

• DGH should complete the national data repository soon to make the open acreage bidding possible

• Change in the PSC

• Exploring various contract models with a view to minimize monitoring of expenditure of the contractor without compromising, firstly, on the Hydrocarbons output across time (and secondly, on the Government’s take on Annexure 4)

*PMO: Prime Minister’s Office **NELP: New Exploration Licensing Policy (international bidding rounds of Oil & Gas blocks in India) #DGH: Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (Technical advisory wing of Petroleum Ministry)

National Security vs. Energy Security

India’s endeavor to minimize dependence on imported Hydrocarbon is facing hurdles from the Defence Ministry – in the name of National Security. There is a growing concern amongst the Oil & Gas companies as their operations are getting stalled because of clearances not being granted by Defence Ministry.

Crude Reality

India is highly dependent on Crude supplies from Middle East and North Africa, which accounts for 60% of supply to India. And the kind of geo-political volatility witnessed in the Middle East andNorth Africa is a cause for concern for India. Not just constraints fromsupply but similar upheaval and uncertainty will automaticallytrigger a drop in crude production resulting in increased crude oilimports and higher prices in turn driving inflation in India.


• Expedite domestic exploration and production

• Lower dependence on Middle East and North Africa

• Look at other supply sources

• Increase the percentage of gas in India’s energy mix

Step On Gas

More than 30% of India’s gas demand is still not fulfilled. And the situation is getting grimmer as the domestic production has not delivered as per expectations.

• Other problems include delayed/failed negotiations for international pipelines (IPI : Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline)

• Problems in sourcing long term LNG (except Qatar and little bit from Australia, there is limited contract for India)

• Competition from China, Japan and South Korea is weighing heavy on India’s aspirations

• China, Japan and South Korea have smoother decision making processes compared to India

• Diplomatic and bureaucratic failures in Qatar and even IPI have defeated India’s energy needs

• Even price issues delayed TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) pipeline

• Limited LNG import infrastructure in the country and concentrated only in western India

Goldman Sachs’ study shows increase of $10/barrel can lower the GDP growth by 0.4%. Also higher Oil prices result in outgo of foreign exchange reserves impacting India’s trade deficit.


• Petroleum Ministry’s “International Cooperation” wing should be strengthened

• At the time of Mani Shankar Aiyar’s tenure as Minister, a special wing focused just on international opportunities was created. It should be revived (under an IFS officer)

• Regulated domestic gas prices acts as a major deterrent

Focus on Overseas M&A

India’s overall Hydrocarbon (Oil & Gas) reserves are limited and it’s not enough to support the future needs. The only option, apart from diversifying import sourcing countries, is to look for assets in Oil & Gas rich countries.


• Petroleum Ministry’s “International Cooperation” wing should be strengthened

• At the time of Mani Shankar Aiyar’s tenure as Minister, a special wing focused just on international opportunities was created. It should be revived (under an IFS officer)

• Create a sovereign fund or consolidated war chest for acquiring assets overseas

• Promote public private partnership for overseas merger and acquisitions

Rationalise Taxation: Give and Take for Energy Security

Any Government can collect revenue from the Petroleum sector by various instruments and in most of the cases Government’s share of economic rent comes primarily through production-based or profit-based instruments. In India, it is a hybrid system. It is a system where the Petroleum companies contribute to Government coffers through royalty payment and also through profit Petroleum.

Thankfully the proposal for windfall tax for the upstream companies, suggested by former petroleum secretary and now planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, did not materialize. Otherwise, it would have been an untimely death for the upstream sector. Nonetheless Government in Budget 2012 still implemented the hike in cess for upstream companies from `2,500 a tonne to `4,500. Though India was never seen as an investment destination for Oil & Gas sector but the discoveries in KG-D6 (for gas) and Barmer block (for oil) revived the investment hopes. But then, the higher cess on Crude production, bringing upstream activities under service tax and taking away tax holiday on gas production certainly are not going to negatively impact the investment sentiments. Exploration is a high-risk activity and it needs sufficient incentive to attract investments.


• Income tax should be levied on all E&P companies uniformly (not separate for foreign firms)

• Service tax on E&P services may continue (move towards GST) but the cess on Crude should be reduced

• India’s present form of PSC regime has attracted lot of criticism, especially from CAG in its audit of private PSCs. CAG suggested royalty based contracts

• Countries like Chile, Ecuador, Norway, Peru, Kazakhstan and Thailand have implemented royalty based regimes

• However, seeing India’s need for more investment in the sector with the present form of profit sharing under PSC should not be tinkered

• Allow tax benefit, uniformly on LNG imports (presently LNG meant for power sector is exempted)

New Technology and New Form of Energy– CBM, Shale Gas, Oil Sands, etc.

• After the traditional form of Oil and Natural Gas, the other form that has taken some shape in India is CBM

• DGH is working on data and policy framework for auctioning Shale Gas assets

• National program on gas hydrate is also being conducted with US companies

• Coal blocks for Coal to Liquid has been allocated to Tata and JSPL in Odisha

Inter-related Policy Framework for Upstream, Midstream and Downstream

• Insufficient oilfield technology and services

• Problems with pipeline infrastructure

Non-commercialization of Discovery: Inadequate E&P Infrastructure \

• Lower investment in the past has resulted in inadequate E&P infrastructure in India

• India’s gas pipeline density (per sq. km) is one of the lowest

• Lower pipeline density leading to lower share of Natural Gas in the overall energy mix (10% vs. global average of 24%)

• Production of Oil & Gas remained stagnant (See Table 4)

• Limited participation from foreign players in NELP rounds

• Inadequate infrastructure leading to non-commercialization of discoveries

• Out of 60 discoveries in nine NELP rounds since 1999, only two have entered production phase

• Shortage of oil rigs too has played spoilsport

Subdued Gas Pricing: Government Regulation Killing Sentiments

• NELP has provision for charging market discovered price for gas

• However, operators have to follow the Government determined price

• Even under regulation: No uniformity in pricing of domestic gas


• Let the market decide the gas prices

• Expedite the national gas grid program (as announced in the budget - 2012) to enhance infrastructure

• The natural gas infrastructure in the country needs an overhaul

• Promote more City Gas Distribution projects and allow market-driven pricing

• More LNG terminals, especially in the east coast, need to be promoted


Though Hydrocarbon will remain one of the key sources for India’s energy security, policy makers, however, can’t ignore the other sources – viz Coal, Hydro-power, Nuclear, and Solar. In fact, Coal is going to play a significant role in India’s energy security. Not just as a big source of fuel (50%), but also because India has huge reserves of Coal.

Of course, within the Hydrocarbon sector, the prospect of Shale Gas and Natural Gas needs to be identified as soon as possible. As far as the present form of allocation and contracts of Oil & Gas blocks are concerned, India needs lot of changes. It should be appreciated that Rangarajan committee is looking at overhauling the present format of PSC. One big move that India needs to make is the shift from annual auctioning of Oil & Gas blocks under NELP to open acreage. For that, DGH needs to finalize the national data repository, so that companies can visit the always open data rooms and can bid whenever they want. This will keep the competition alive and also allow speedy exploration program in the country. DGH/Government also needs to finalize the terms for Shale Gas block bidding, so that India can take advantage of the development in the rest of the world. On regulation front, Government needs to stop regulating gas prices and let the market decide the prices. This will make the market more competitive and more remunerative for the investors. Also this will give the much needed impetus to the Gas retail sector in the country, which ultimately has the potential to lower the dependence on imports of liquid fuel. Focus also needs to be given to the PSU oil companies, who for all these years have contributed to the growth of Energy security of the country. Overall, India’s Energy sector needs a concerted coordination between the departments, and more Public-Private Partnership will do the trick. We should also ensure that foreign companies, such as ENI and mining major BHP Billiton, having deep pockets, should get the right platform to drill deep to ensure India’s Energy Security.



1. BP Statistical Review 2012

2. Planning Commission 2012

3. BP Energy Statistics 2012

4. Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell

5. Petroleum Ministry Data 2012

6. Petroleum Ministry 2012



Tel: +91 9650175231

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @indenergysecure




Share article

Jun 12, 2021

Why Transmission & Distribution Utilities Need Digital Twins

Petri Rauhakallio
6 min
Petri Rauhakallio at Sharper Shape outlines the Digital Twins benefits for energy transmission and distribution utilities

As with any new technology, Digital twins can create as many questions as answers. There can be a natural resistance, especially among senior utility executives who are used to the old ways and need a compelling case to invest in new ones. 

So is digital twin just a fancy name for modelling? And why do many senior leaders and engineers at power transmission & distribution (T&D) companies have a gnawing feeling they should have one? Ultimately it comes down to one key question: is this a trend worth our time and money?

The short answer is yes, if approached intelligently and accounting for utilities’ specific needs. This is no case of runaway hype or an overwrought name for an underwhelming development – digital twin technology can be genuinely transformational if done right. So here are six reasons why in five years no T&D utility will want to be without a digital twin. 

1. Smarter Asset Planning

A digital twin is a real-time digital counterpart of a utility’s real-world grid. A proper digital twin – and not just a static 3D model of some adjacent assets – represents the grid in as much detail as possible, is updated in real-time and can be used to model ‘what if’ scenarios to gauge the effects in real life. It is the repository in which to collect and index all network data, from images, to 3D pointclouds, to past reports and analyses.

With that in mind, an obvious use-case for a digital twin is planning upgrades and expansions. For example, if a developer wants to connect a major solar generation asset, what effect might that have on the grid assets, and will they need upgrading or reinforcement? A seasoned engineer can offer an educated prediction if they are familiar with the local assets, their age and their condition – but with a digital twin they can simply model the scenario on the digital twin and find out.

The decision is more likely to be the right one, the utility is less likely to be blindsided by unforeseen complications, and less time and money need be spent visiting the site and validating information.

As the energy transition accelerates, both transmission and distribution (T&D) utilities will receive more connection requests for anything from solar parks to electric vehicle charging infrastructure, to heat pumps and batteries – and all this on top of normal grid upgrade programs. A well-constructed digital twin may come to be an essential tool to keep up with the pace of change.

2. Improved Inspection and Maintenance

Utilities spend enormous amounts of time and money on asset inspection and maintenance – they have to in order to meet their operational and safety responsibilities. In order to make the task more manageable, most utilities try to prioritise the most critical or fragile parts of the network for inspection, based on past inspection data and engineers’ experience. Many are investigating how to better collect, store and analyze data in order to hone this process, with the ultimate goal of predicting where inspections and maintenance are going to be needed before problems arise.  

The digital twin is the platform that contextualises this information. Data is tagged to assets in the model, analytics and AI algorithms are applied and suggested interventions are automatically flagged to the human user, who can understand what and where the problem is thanks to the twin. As new data is collected over time, the process only becomes more effective.

3. More Efficient Vegetation Management

Utilities – especially transmission utilities in areas of high wildfire-risk – are in a constant struggle with nature to keep vegetation in-check that surrounds power lines and other assets. Failure risks outages, damage to assets and even a fire threat. A comprehensive digital twin won’t just incorporate the grid assets – a network of powerlines and pylons isolated on an otherwise blank screen – but the immediate surroundings too. This means local houses, roads, waterways and trees. 

If the twin is enriched with vegetation data on factors such as the species, growth rate and health of a tree, then the utility can use it to assess the risk from any given twig or branch neighbouring one of its assets, and prioritise and dispatch vegetation management crews accordingly. 

And with expansion planning, inspection and maintenance, the value here is less labor-intensive and more cost-effective decision making and planning – essential in an industry of tight margins and constrained resources. What’s more, the value only rises over time as feedback allows the utility to finesse the program.

4. Automated powerline inspection

Remember though, that to be maximally useful, a digital twin must be kept up to date. A larger utility might blanche at the resources required to not just to map and inspect the network once in order to build the twin, but update that twin at regular intervals.

However, digital twins are also an enabling technology for another technological step-change – automated powerline inspection.

Imagine a fleet of sensor-equipped drones empowered to fly the lines almost constantly, returning (automatically) only to recharge their batteries. Not only would such a set-up be far cheaper to operate than a comparable fleet of human inspectors, it could provide far more detail at far more regular intervals, facilitating all the above benefits of better planning, inspection, maintenance and vegetation management. Human inspectors could be reserved for non-routine interventions that really require their hard-earned expertise.

In this scenario, the digital twin provides he ‘map’ by which the drone can plan a route and navigate itself, in conjunction with its sensors. 

5. Improved Emergency Modelling and Faster Response

If the worst happens and emergency strikes, such as a wildfire or natural disaster, digital twins can again prove invaluable. The intricate, detailed understanding of the grid, assets and its surroundings that a digital twin gives is an element of order in a chaotic situation, and can guide the utility and emergency services alike in mounting an informed response.

And once again, the digital twin’s facility for ‘what-if’ scenario testing is especially useful for emergency preparedness. If a hurricane strikes at point X, what will be the effect on assets at point Y? If a downed pylon sparks a fire at point A, what residences are nearby and what does an evacuation plan look like?

6. Easier accommodation of external stakeholders

Finally, a digital twin can make lighter work of engaging with external stakeholders. The world doesn’t stand still, and a once blissfully-isolated powerline may suddenly find itself adjacent to a building site for a new building or road. 

As well as planning for connection (see point 1), a digital twin takes the pain out of those processes that require interfacing with external stakeholders, such as maintenance contractors, arborists, trimming crews or local government agencies – the digital twin breaks down the silos between these groups and allows them to work from a single version of the truth – in future it could even be used as part of the bid process for contractors.

These six reasons for why digital twins will be indispensable to power T&D utilities are only the tip of the iceberg; the possibilities are endless given the constant advancement of data collection an analysis technology. No doubt these will invite even more questions – and we relish the challenge of answering them. 


Share article