Commute from Suburbia Comes With Huge Energy Costs

By Admin
Anyone stuck in the toxic gridlock of rush hour traffic can support the claim that there are just too many drivers on the road. While the cluster-cram...

Anyone stuck in the toxic gridlock of rush hour traffic can support the claim that there are just too many drivers on the road. While the cluster-cram of high population indeed contributes to many commuter's anxiety and stress levels, it also creates a lot more harm, by consuming an alarming rate of energy. That is why experts are claiming living in an urban environment within walk-able distance of public transportation is one of the most energy saving practices a person can perform to reduce costs and conserve resources.

While people have strove to reduce their energy use in recent years, doing everything from installing energy efficient light bulbs, home appliances and supplemental solar out-fittings, these steps, though in the right direction, are small compared to the enormous energy footprint created by transportation. While Energy Star homes save energy at an average of 20 percent, that is still below the energy impact gleaned from merely riding public transit as opposed to commuting.

 

SEE OTHER TOP STORIES IN THE ENERGY DIGITAL CONTENT NETWORK

Tension with Iran: West Readies Emergency Oil Supply

America's Shale Revolution

January's issue of Energy Digital has gone live!

Currently 70 percent of all energy use comes from building and transportation expenditures. Single passenger transportation is not just an issue of dramatic energy consumption, but it is also a poisonous agent in environmental pollution. When tied with building use, transportation creates 63 percent of greenhouse emissions, which constitutes the majority chunk of toxic pollution.  

According to a recent English study, a single-family living in a suburban housing district consumes an average of 240 million BTUs (British Thermal Units), while a, “transit-oriented development” consumes an average of 147 million BTUs, approximately a third less overall energy consumption than the suburban dweller. The majority of this huge energy discrepancy comes from the suburban livers commute to work, as their transportation energy-use alone accounts for 132 million BTUs a year. Yup, it is shocking, but a person living in the suburbs uses almost as much energy in commuting alone, than an urban resident uses all together, in all facets of their life.

So while we make great strides as a country in becoming aware of our correlation to energy,  we ultimately may need to reshape our American Dream, and trade in that big house in the suburbs for a city apartment with sweeping views of the subway. 

DOWNLOAD THE ENERGY DIGITAL IPAD APP 

Share

Featured Articles

5 minutes with Stuart Broadley, Energy Industries Council

EIC CEO Stuart Broadley reveals the challenges that lie ahead for oil and gas firms now net zero is becoming an increasingly important goal for businesses

SAP: Is 'complex' wind energy supply chain slowing adoption?

SAP digital supply chain and manufacturing expert Darcy MacClaren warns complex logistics and complicated regulations are limiting wind energy adoption

Decentralised energy key to circumventing grid delays

Aggreko is advising the sector to consider short to mid-term decentralised energy solutions as an effective means of maintaining business continuity.

Renewable energy to become top source of electricity by 2025

Renewable Energy

Nuclear energy — the unsung hero of the climate challenge

Renewable Energy

UK and US announce energy partnership

Oil & Gas