Commute from Suburbia Comes With Huge Energy Costs

By Admin
Anyone stuck in the toxic gridlock of rush hour traffic can support the claim that there are just too many drivers on the road. While the cluster-cram...

Anyone stuck in the toxic gridlock of rush hour traffic can support the claim that there are just too many drivers on the road. While the cluster-cram of high population indeed contributes to many commuter's anxiety and stress levels, it also creates a lot more harm, by consuming an alarming rate of energy. That is why experts are claiming living in an urban environment within walk-able distance of public transportation is one of the most energy saving practices a person can perform to reduce costs and conserve resources.

While people have strove to reduce their energy use in recent years, doing everything from installing energy efficient light bulbs, home appliances and supplemental solar out-fittings, these steps, though in the right direction, are small compared to the enormous energy footprint created by transportation. While Energy Star homes save energy at an average of 20 percent, that is still below the energy impact gleaned from merely riding public transit as opposed to commuting.

 

SEE OTHER TOP STORIES IN THE ENERGY DIGITAL CONTENT NETWORK

Tension with Iran: West Readies Emergency Oil Supply

America's Shale Revolution

January's issue of Energy Digital has gone live!

Currently 70 percent of all energy use comes from building and transportation expenditures. Single passenger transportation is not just an issue of dramatic energy consumption, but it is also a poisonous agent in environmental pollution. When tied with building use, transportation creates 63 percent of greenhouse emissions, which constitutes the majority chunk of toxic pollution.  

According to a recent English study, a single-family living in a suburban housing district consumes an average of 240 million BTUs (British Thermal Units), while a, “transit-oriented development” consumes an average of 147 million BTUs, approximately a third less overall energy consumption than the suburban dweller. The majority of this huge energy discrepancy comes from the suburban livers commute to work, as their transportation energy-use alone accounts for 132 million BTUs a year. Yup, it is shocking, but a person living in the suburbs uses almost as much energy in commuting alone, than an urban resident uses all together, in all facets of their life.

So while we make great strides as a country in becoming aware of our correlation to energy,  we ultimately may need to reshape our American Dream, and trade in that big house in the suburbs for a city apartment with sweeping views of the subway. 

DOWNLOAD THE ENERGY DIGITAL IPAD APP 

Share

Featured Articles

What's Apple’s Promise on Clean Energy and Water Investment?

Tech giant Apple is working to increase its sustainable output, supporting more than 18GW of clean energy use & billions of gallons in water savings

Data Centre Demand Putting Pressure on Energy Capabilities

Utilities in the US are predicting a tidal wave of demand for data centres thanks to the boom of AI, which, in turn, will dial up the need for electricity

Q&A with Hitachi Energy’s EVP & Head of North America

Anthony Allard, who heads up Hitachi Energy as Executive Vice President and Head of North America, shares why the grid is holding us back from clean energy

OMV Takes Strides in Energy Efficiency & Emissions Reduction

Sustainability

Q&A with RAIN Alliance President and CEO Aileen Ryan

Technology & AI

Who is Greg Joiner, the new Head of Shell Energy?

Oil & Gas