Mar 13, 2014

How to manage waste on offshore oil rigs

3 min
Follow @EnergyDigital

The March issue of Energy Digital magazine is live

There are more than 4,000 offshore oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico and during the exploration and production of oil a lot of waste – from industrial to human – is generated that must be managed. What options do offshore rigs have to manage waste?

In the United States, offshore oil and gas companies have three main options for waste disposal – discharge to the sea, underground injection or encapsulation, and onshore disposal. A fourth option, incineration, has rarely been used, according to the report “Offshore Waste Management – Discharge, Inject, or Haul to Shore?” written by John A. Veil, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, D.C.,for the Integrated Petroleum Environmental Consortium.

The American Petroleum Institute surveyed the U.S. onshore oil and gas industry in 1995 to estimate the volume of E&P wastes that were generated. Almost 18 billion barrels of produced water, about 150 million barrels of drilling waste, and about 20 million barrels of other types of exploration and production waste were generated from onshore oil and gas facilities in 1995, the report states.

The wastes most commonly associated with offshore E&P activities include: Drilling fluids, drill cuttings, produced water, treatment, workover, and completion fluids, deck drainage, produced sand, naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM), hydrostatic test water, and other assorted wastes, including sanitary.

The U.S. government does not dictate a specific disposal option that must be used. The U.S. legal system establishes requirements for each disposal option, and companies decide for themselves which of the options they will follow. Numerous potential waste management options exist, but many of those potential options are precluded by regulatory requirements, according to Veil’s report.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency prohibits the practice of discharging oil-based drilling fluids in the sea, so that option, which may be cost effective, is eliminated. Other potential options are discarded for legal or technical reasons and offshore operators usually have a strict catalog of legal and technical options. Operators will choose from these remaining waste management options on the basis of total costs.

Wastes that are in compliance with permits and other regulatory requirements will mostly be discharged at sea. Those wastes that cannot be discharged are injected or are brought to shore for disposal. The industry has developed an effective infrastructure for collection, transportation, and onshore disposal of wastes that are not suitable for on-site discharge or injection, according to the report.

In the Gulf of Mexico, nearly all of the other wastes are brought to shore for disposal. Injection of E&P wastes occurs only occasionally in the Gulf of Mexico. In California, small volumes of drilling wastes and treatment, workover, and completion fluids are disposed through annular injection. Other types of wastes are brought to shore and disposed of in accordance with state rules, the report states.

Share article

Apr 16, 2021

Hydrostor receives $4m funding for A-CAES facility in Canada

Dominic Ellis
2 min
The funding will be used to complete essential engineering and planning, and enable Hydrostor to take critical steps toward construction
The funding will be used to complete essential engineering and planning, and enable Hydrostor to take critical steps toward construction...

Hydrostor has received $4m funding to develop a 300-500MW Advanced Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) facility in Canada.

The funding will be used to complete essential engineering and planning, and enable Hydrostor to plan construction. 

The project will be modeled on Hydrostor’s commercially operating Goderich storage facility, providing up to 12 hours of energy storage.

The project has support from Natural Resources Canada’s Energy Innovation Program and Sustainable Development Technology Canada.

Hydrostor’s A-CAES system supports Canada’s green economic transition by designing, building, and operating emissions-free energy storage facilities, and employing people, suppliers, and technologies from the oil and gas sector.

The Honorable Seamus O’Regan, Jr. Minister of Natural Resources, said: “Investing in clean technology will lower emissions and increase our competitiveness. This is how we get to net zero by 2050.”

A-CAES has the potential to lower greenhouse gas emissions by enabling the transition to a cleaner and more flexible electricity grid. Specifically, the low-impact and cost-effective technology will reduce the use of fossil fuels and will provide reliable and bankable energy storage solutions for utilities and regulators, while integrating renewable energy for sustainable growth. 

Curtis VanWalleghem, Hydrostor’s Chief Executive Officer, said: “We are grateful for the federal government’s support of our long duration energy storage solution that is critical to enabling the clean energy transition. This made-in-Canada solution, with the support of NRCan and Sustainable Development Technology Canada, is ready to be widely deployed within Canada and globally to lower electricity rates and decarbonize the electricity sector."

The Rosamond A-CAES 500MW Project is under advanced development and targeting a 2024 launch. It is designed to turn California’s growing solar and wind resources into on-demand peak capacity while allowing for closure of fossil fuel generating stations.

Hydrostor closed US$37 million (C$49 million) in growth financing in September 2019. 

Share article