Blue Hydrogen 'difficult to justify on climate grounds'

By Dominic Ellis
Share
New research paper on Blue Hydrogen likely to send shockwaves as hydrogen investment steps up globally

The use of blue hydrogen appears difficult to justify on climate grounds as its greenhouse gas footprint is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, according to a new How green is blue hydrogen? research paper.

The findings from Robert Howarth at Cornell University and Mark Jacobson from Stanford University are likely to send shockwaves globally as international investment steps up in hydrogen to meet net zero targets, and comes shortly after the release of the IPCC report which said rapid and sustained actions are needed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

The new report states the vast majority of hydrogen (96%) is generated from fossil fuels, particularly from steam methane reforming (SMR) of natural gas but also from coal gasification.

"Often, blue hydrogen is described as having zero or low greenhouse gas emissions," the report states. "However, this is not true: not all of carbon dioxide emissions can be captured, and some carbon dioxide is emitted during the production of blue hydrogen. Further, to date no peer-reviewed analysis has considered methane emissions associated with producing the natural gas needed to generate blue hydrogen."

It adds methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and compared mass-to-mass, is more than 100 times more powerful as a warming agent than carbon dioxide for the time both gases are in the atmosphere, and causes 86 times the warming as carbon dioxide over an integrated 20-year time frame after a pulsed emission of the two gases.

The best-case scenario for producing blue hydrogen, using renewable electricity instead of natural gas to power the processes, suggests to us that there really is no role for blue hydrogen in a carbon-free future, the report adds.

"Greenhouse gas emissions remain high, and there would also be a substantial consumption of renewable electricity, which represents an opportunity cost. We believe the renewable electricity could be better used by society in other ways, replacing the use of fossil fuels," it states. "Similarly, we see no advantage in using blue hydrogen powered by natural gas compared with simply using the natural gas directly for heat."

Green hydrogen projects - which generate hydrogen using zero-carbon sources such as renewables or nuclear power - currently dominate the market, with 52 operational projects globally. Four blue hydrogen projects are currently underway in the UK, and one in Sweden and the Netherlands, according to the Hydrogen Map.

China's annual demand for hydrogen alone will reach 37.15 million tons by 2030, accounting for some 5% of the end-use energy consumption; by 2060, the annual demand will increase to 130 million tons, a 20% in the total end-use energy consumption.

Share

Featured Articles

What's Happening at the WEF's Davos Meeting 2025?

The World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting agenda promises to cover sustainability and energy issues from the environment to people and new technologies

What Role Do China, Siemens & Supply Chains Play in UK Wind?

China dominates wind power production and clean energy manufacturing, reshaping global supply chains. However, its role in UK energy sparks criticism

The O2: World's Busiest Live Venue Optimises Energy Use

The O2, owned and operated by AEG Europe, is commended for its sustainability progress – and is committed to going further and faster

Top 10: Energy Influencers

Smart Energy

2024: A Year of Energy Digital Covers

Smart Energy

Cadence: Energy Efficiency Challenges with AI Data Centres

Technology & AI