May 17, 2020

Americans support carbon reducing standards

4 min
New carbon pollution standards
Most Americans in four key senators states support the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys mission to protect health and the environment, and want th...

Most Americans in four key senators’ states support the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s mission to protect health and the environment, and want the agency to limit carbon pollution from power plants, according to a new poll commissioned by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Conducted by Public Policy Polling, the separate polls in Arkansas, Illinois, Louisiana and New Hampshire also found overwhelming majorities in each state trust the EPA, and not Congress, to set limits on carbon pollution released by power plants, a key driver of climate change, and most believe such limits would drive innovation and job creation.

In separate polling, the NRDC Action Fund found that more people in those states would support a candidate who supports the EPA setting the first-ever carbon pollution standards, rather than one who does not.

Power plants are the nation’s single-largest source of such pollution, accounting for 40 percent of national carbon pollution.

“And yet, there are no federal limits on the amount of dangerous carbon pollution our power plants may release,” said David Goldston, director of government affairs at NRDC. “We limit the amount of mercury, arsenic, soot, and other harmful pollution from these plants. It's time to cut carbon pollution.”

President Obama promised to do so through the climate action plan he announced in June. He directed the EPA to use its authority under the Clean Air Act to set the first federal limits on the amount of carbon pollution power plants may release. The EPA proposed standards for new plants in September and will propose limits for existing plants by June 2014.

The NRDC poll asked Americans in the four states who they trusted to decide whether there should be limits on carbon pollution: the EPA or Congress. Sixty-five percent of Arkansans trust the EPA while only 8 percent trust Congress; 68 percent of Illinoisans trust the EPA compared to 6 percent who trust Congress; in Louisiana, 67 percent trust the EPA while only 8 percent trust Congress; and in New Hampshire respondents trust EPA over Congress, 71 percent to 6 percent.

The poll also asked about impact on jobs and the economy. Respondents were asked which they believed about the standards: that they’ll put at risk the 760,000 jobs supported by the coal-based industry; or that pollution safeguards could spark innovation and create 210,000 new jobs by upgrading older power plants and increasing energy efficiency.

In Arkansas, 41 to 36 percent said they believed that the standards would create jobs; In Illinois, job creation led by 52 to 28 percent; in Louisiana job creation led by 44 to 32 percent and in New Hampshire job creation won out 55 to 33 percent.

Survey respondents in these states are strongly behind the EPA doing its job. In Arkansas, 54 percent said the EPA is doing the right amount or not enough to protect health and the environment; in Illinois it was 62 percent; in Louisiana it was 59 percent; and in New Hampshire it was 58 percent.

In its separate polling for the NRDC Action Fund, PPP found:
* In Arkansas, 42 percent said they would support a generic candidate who backs EPA taking action on carbon, compared to 34 percent for those opposing action.
* In Illinois, 53 percent said they would support a generic candidate who backs EPA taking action on carbon, compared to 29 percent for those opposing action.
* In Louisiana, 47 percent said they would support a generic candidate who backs EPA taking action on carbon, compared to 32 percent for those opposing action.
* In New Hampshire, 54 percent said they would support a generic candidate who backs EPA taking action on carbon, compared to 30 percent for those opposing action.

The polls were conducted Oct. 30-31. PPP surveyed: 1,279 voters in Arkansas for a margin of error of plus or minus 2.7 percent; 1,126 voters in Illinois with a margin of error of 2.9 percent; 1,067 voters in Louisiana with a margin of error of 3 percent; and 966 voters in New Hampshire with a margin of error of 3.2 percent.

For details from each poll, click here:

Share article

Jun 12, 2021

Why Transmission & Distribution Utilities Need Digital Twins

Petri Rauhakallio
6 min
Petri Rauhakallio at Sharper Shape outlines the Digital Twins benefits for energy transmission and distribution utilities

As with any new technology, Digital twins can create as many questions as answers. There can be a natural resistance, especially among senior utility executives who are used to the old ways and need a compelling case to invest in new ones. 

So is digital twin just a fancy name for modelling? And why do many senior leaders and engineers at power transmission & distribution (T&D) companies have a gnawing feeling they should have one? Ultimately it comes down to one key question: is this a trend worth our time and money?

The short answer is yes, if approached intelligently and accounting for utilities’ specific needs. This is no case of runaway hype or an overwrought name for an underwhelming development – digital twin technology can be genuinely transformational if done right. So here are six reasons why in five years no T&D utility will want to be without a digital twin. 

1. Smarter Asset Planning

A digital twin is a real-time digital counterpart of a utility’s real-world grid. A proper digital twin – and not just a static 3D model of some adjacent assets – represents the grid in as much detail as possible, is updated in real-time and can be used to model ‘what if’ scenarios to gauge the effects in real life. It is the repository in which to collect and index all network data, from images, to 3D pointclouds, to past reports and analyses.

With that in mind, an obvious use-case for a digital twin is planning upgrades and expansions. For example, if a developer wants to connect a major solar generation asset, what effect might that have on the grid assets, and will they need upgrading or reinforcement? A seasoned engineer can offer an educated prediction if they are familiar with the local assets, their age and their condition – but with a digital twin they can simply model the scenario on the digital twin and find out.

The decision is more likely to be the right one, the utility is less likely to be blindsided by unforeseen complications, and less time and money need be spent visiting the site and validating information.

As the energy transition accelerates, both transmission and distribution (T&D) utilities will receive more connection requests for anything from solar parks to electric vehicle charging infrastructure, to heat pumps and batteries – and all this on top of normal grid upgrade programs. A well-constructed digital twin may come to be an essential tool to keep up with the pace of change.

2. Improved Inspection and Maintenance

Utilities spend enormous amounts of time and money on asset inspection and maintenance – they have to in order to meet their operational and safety responsibilities. In order to make the task more manageable, most utilities try to prioritise the most critical or fragile parts of the network for inspection, based on past inspection data and engineers’ experience. Many are investigating how to better collect, store and analyze data in order to hone this process, with the ultimate goal of predicting where inspections and maintenance are going to be needed before problems arise.  

The digital twin is the platform that contextualises this information. Data is tagged to assets in the model, analytics and AI algorithms are applied and suggested interventions are automatically flagged to the human user, who can understand what and where the problem is thanks to the twin. As new data is collected over time, the process only becomes more effective.

3. More Efficient Vegetation Management

Utilities – especially transmission utilities in areas of high wildfire-risk – are in a constant struggle with nature to keep vegetation in-check that surrounds power lines and other assets. Failure risks outages, damage to assets and even a fire threat. A comprehensive digital twin won’t just incorporate the grid assets – a network of powerlines and pylons isolated on an otherwise blank screen – but the immediate surroundings too. This means local houses, roads, waterways and trees. 

If the twin is enriched with vegetation data on factors such as the species, growth rate and health of a tree, then the utility can use it to assess the risk from any given twig or branch neighbouring one of its assets, and prioritise and dispatch vegetation management crews accordingly. 

And with expansion planning, inspection and maintenance, the value here is less labor-intensive and more cost-effective decision making and planning – essential in an industry of tight margins and constrained resources. What’s more, the value only rises over time as feedback allows the utility to finesse the program.

4. Automated powerline inspection

Remember though, that to be maximally useful, a digital twin must be kept up to date. A larger utility might blanche at the resources required to not just to map and inspect the network once in order to build the twin, but update that twin at regular intervals.

However, digital twins are also an enabling technology for another technological step-change – automated powerline inspection.

Imagine a fleet of sensor-equipped drones empowered to fly the lines almost constantly, returning (automatically) only to recharge their batteries. Not only would such a set-up be far cheaper to operate than a comparable fleet of human inspectors, it could provide far more detail at far more regular intervals, facilitating all the above benefits of better planning, inspection, maintenance and vegetation management. Human inspectors could be reserved for non-routine interventions that really require their hard-earned expertise.

In this scenario, the digital twin provides he ‘map’ by which the drone can plan a route and navigate itself, in conjunction with its sensors. 

5. Improved Emergency Modelling and Faster Response

If the worst happens and emergency strikes, such as a wildfire or natural disaster, digital twins can again prove invaluable. The intricate, detailed understanding of the grid, assets and its surroundings that a digital twin gives is an element of order in a chaotic situation, and can guide the utility and emergency services alike in mounting an informed response.

And once again, the digital twin’s facility for ‘what-if’ scenario testing is especially useful for emergency preparedness. If a hurricane strikes at point X, what will be the effect on assets at point Y? If a downed pylon sparks a fire at point A, what residences are nearby and what does an evacuation plan look like?

6. Easier accommodation of external stakeholders

Finally, a digital twin can make lighter work of engaging with external stakeholders. The world doesn’t stand still, and a once blissfully-isolated powerline may suddenly find itself adjacent to a building site for a new building or road. 

As well as planning for connection (see point 1), a digital twin takes the pain out of those processes that require interfacing with external stakeholders, such as maintenance contractors, arborists, trimming crews or local government agencies – the digital twin breaks down the silos between these groups and allows them to work from a single version of the truth – in future it could even be used as part of the bid process for contractors.

These six reasons for why digital twins will be indispensable to power T&D utilities are only the tip of the iceberg; the possibilities are endless given the constant advancement of data collection an analysis technology. No doubt these will invite even more questions – and we relish the challenge of answering them. 


Share article