May 17, 2020

The Republican Debate: The GOP on Energy

Energy
gop
republican
debate
Admin
4 min
The Republican debate in Iowa sees the GOP feud over cap-and-trade, the EPA, wind energy and corn ethanol
The Republican debate last night saw heated exchanges between the GOPs 2012 presidential hopefuls. While the economy took center stage, energy and the...

The Republican debate last night saw heated exchanges between the GOP’s 2012 presidential hopefuls.  While the economy took center stage, energy and the environment were topics of excited debate, especially one of the most controversial topics for Republicans: climate change.  Yes, cap-and-trade, the policy once hailed and later dismissed by Republicans as a free market means by which to control carbon dioxide emissions sparked the back and forth finger-pointing banter one comes to expect from these types of publicity stunts.  This of course leads to questioning the EPA’s oversight altogether.  However, considering the debate was held in Iowa—where wind energy and corn ethanol play an integral role in the state’s economy—candidates praised the two forms of energy typically scoffed at by Republicans.

Let’s start with cap-and-trade.  Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) tore apart Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty for his prior support of cap-and-trade policy.  Referencing Pawlenty’s position as one of the Republican party’s leading climate advocates over the years, Bachmann accused him of pursuing policies similar to President Obama.  She commented, "When you were governor of Minnesota, you implemented cap-and-trade in our state, and you praised the unconstitutional individual [health] mandate, and ... you said the era of small government was over. That sounds a lot more like Barack Obama if you ask me."

SEE OTHER TOP STORIES IN THE WDM CONTENT NETWORK

Can Renewable Biomass Power a Coal Plant?

Logistics: Mining for Energy

Read the latest issue of Energy Digital!

However, Pawlenty, along with Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), and former Governors Mitt Romney of Massachusetts and Jon Huntsman of Utah, have all backed away from once acknowledging the science of climate change and the need to address it.  Huntsman has been reported as saying that science should lead the discussion on climate change, although he no longer supports cap-and-trade for carbon dioxide regulation. 

Each of the candidates seems to have a strong position against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with Michelle Bachmann going as far as to call it the “job killing” agency of America in a previous debate in June.  However, Bachmann has repeatedly sought stimulus money and EPA grants for her state in the past.  What none of these candidates seems to realize, however, is that while the EPA certainly makes it more difficult for companies to get the job done, it's because they actually have to make sure it gets done right.  Could you imagine how much more polluted our waterways and land would be if there were no regulatory body?  Do these candidates really think that corporations will invest the extra time, money and manpower to make their operations as safe as possible both for human and the environmental health if there were no regulatory body making them do it?  I think not… at least not the majority.

Moving on.  Wind energy and corn ethanol got a positive nod from nearly all the Republican candidates at the debate, and while that may leave some of you scratching your head in disbelief, there is one very good reason for it.  The debate was held in Iowa, a state that rakes in over $5 billion a year from wind power and corn ethanol.  Huntsman has actually decided not to campaign in Iowa for fears that his opposition to subsidies for corn ethanol is too great a political hurdle to overcome in a state with such a strong agricultural base.  The majority of the candidates, however, showed support for Iowa’s pursuit of clean energy alternatives and are expected to sign a 130-foot-long wind turbine blade as a symbolic gesture.

While most of the candidates have certainly had their fair share of flip-flops on the issues across the board in regard to energy policy, one thing is clear.  If a Republican makes it into office in 2012, there will be a dramatic overhauling of environmental oversight.  With the U.S. economy struggling it will be a welcome opportunity to open up jobs and ease financial troubles.  Let’s just hope that America’s economic downgrade doesn’t equate to the same kind of environmental downgrade seen in countries with much less stringent regulation.  Sure, China’s economy is on the rise, but the phrase “breath of fresh air” doesn’t apply there. 

DOWNLOAD THE ENERGY DIGITAL iPAD APP

 

 

 

   

 

 

Share article

Jun 2, 2021

bp buys 9GW of solar projects from 7X Energy for $220m

bp
USA
Solar
Dominic Ellis
2 min
bp steps up its solar renewables profile with $220 million purchase of 7X Energy sites across 12 US states

bp is to buy 9GW of solar development projects in the US from independent solar developer 7X Energy.

bp will pay 7X Energy $220 million for the projects and 1GW of 'safe harbour' equipment and expects the acquisition to complete in 30 days. The projects, spread across 12 states - with the largest portfolios in Texas (ERCOT) and MidWest (PJM) - are expected to meet bp’s low carbon investment criteria, generating returns of at least 8-10%.

Assets with a combined generating capacity of 2.2GW are expected to reach final investment decision (FID) by 2025, with the remaining progressing by 2030. Once developed, these projects will have the capacity to generate enough clean energy to power around 1.7 million US homes. The development is also expected to support thousands of jobs through construction.

The acquisition represents a significant step towards bp’s target of growing its net developed renewable generating capacity to 20GW by 2025 and aim to increase this to 50GW by 2030.

The deal will also grow bp’s renewables pipeline from 14GW to 23GW. The assets will be developed through bp’s 50-50 solar joint venture Lightsource bp, which will apply its capabilities to accelerate bp’s renewables targets.

Dev Sanyal, bp executive vice president of gas and low carbon energy, said: "With this purchase, we are continuing to put our strategy in action as we grow our renewables business in a deliberate and disciplined way. It brings us 9GW of high-quality solar projects in markets where we can create integrated renewable energy offers through our trading and customer franchises."

More than half of new US utility-scale solar PV capacity is planned for four states this year, with Texas comfortably the largest (28%), followed by Nevada (9%), California (9%), and North Carolina (7%), according to the US Energy Information Administration. Solar will account for 39% of all new US electricity generation capacity in 2021, surpassing wind for the first time, according to ResearchAndMarkets.com.

Share article